Thursday, September 12, 2002
and now, back to the intellectual property.
more on Kenman Kandy.
Michael Handler, another ip aficionado (watch that name!) has pointed out to me that I have been much more restrained in my critique of Kenman Kandy on my blog than I have in discussing it with him. He is, of course, correct. I really do prefer Lindgren J's judgment, as I said, and for largely the reasons I said, although I would add one more: why would anyone bother registering designs if they can rely on a Kenman Kandy approach to three dimensional shapes? Remembering too that design rights are at least, time limited, and for a reason. grrr.
Comments:
Post a Comment
